Local Gestures
because the personal is cultural
Yes, Gladyszewski does invoke magic by concealing bodies in darkness, like when Martin Bélanger’s arms appear out of nothingness from behind a strip of light and float in the air. The image recalls Brice Leroux’s Quantum-Quintet (FTA, 2007) and Cindy Van Acker’s Obtus (FTA, 2011). Half-seen, the movement becomes inexplicable. Lights in the sky are a familiar sight; it’s only when they move in unexpected ways that we suspect alien life. It’s for this reason that I’m less convinced by the voice work of the performers, decidedly too human.
For the most part, however, Gladyszewski uses technology to reveal what is always there but which usually goes unseen. Such is the case with cameras that reveal the heat patterns of the human body and of the liquids it comes in contact with. Suddenly, it’s like we’ve entered a psychedelic world where the human body is turned inside out, a world of tie-dye souls and auras as moving skins. The body becomes as malleable as playdough, liquefies before our very eyes. We are witness to the com/motion of the dis/embodied internal. Our bodies are haunted by spirits whose life force is muffled by their shells. It’s otherworldly, yet the internal landscape laid before us is so recognizable that I was tempted to scream, “This is the real world! The world where our bodies appear to be solid is obviously a lie!” And I was completely sober. That’s why you should see Phos. May 28-31 Place des Arts – Studio O Vertigo www.fta.qc.ca 514.844.3822 Tickets: 29$ / 30 years old and under: 23$
0 Comments
First off, let me say that I’ve only been following choreographer Daniel Léveillé’s work since 2006. I’m mentioning this because, though Léveillé’s style remains just as recognizable in Solitudes duo, there are also some noticeable departures, at least to those of us who’ve only been following him for the past decade. Like Mathieu Campeau and Justin Gionet drawing circles with their hips in the first duet, which comes across as downright flirtatious. Léveillé’s choreography looks a little less cold and mechanical, a bit more theatrical.
When Ellen Furey looks up to the ceiling, her eyes are so expressive as to look frightened. For a moment, her interaction with Gionet is even messy; not as a result of the effort required, as is usually the case in Léveillé’s work, but in its very performance. One could blame the music – which so easily colours our perception of the dance – for these changes. Léveillé predictably goes for Bach and Royer, but surprisingly slips in some classic rock (The Doors and The Beatles). It’s not just the music though. The dance is more languorous. While there must have been duos in Léveillé’s group works, I don’t recall anything ever looking this… coupley. Brianna Lombardo and Emmanuel Proulx hold hands and use all of the resulting arms’ length as tape to wrap around their partner. Since Léveillé’s movement seems based on an aesthetic rather than on its effect, there’s usually some incidental humour that slips into the choreography. Not so here. We have to wait until the last duet with Campeau and Esther Gaudette to find some humour and it’s calculatedly funny. For starters, the dance is set to The Beatles’ “I Want You (She’s So Heavy).” Given how much Léveillé capitalizes on lifts and gravity, that choice can only be qualified as a joke. As if that weren’t enough, the dancers headbang, make the devil sign, and thrust their hips. How ironic that the more Léveillé’s dancers have clothes on, the more sexual they act. Sometimes, it looks like it could have been choreographed by Virginie Brunelle. Solitudes duo is, like all of Léveillé’s work, a dance of every moment; there is no climax. Yet, when it ends, it still manages to feel a bit too short. May 26-28 at 9pm Agora de la danse www.fta.qc.ca 514.844.3822 Tickets: 45$ / 30 years old and under: 38$
Israeli choreographer Arkadi Zaides is that mirror in Archive, a demanding but necessary performance presented by Festival TransAmériques. Zaides took a series of video images from B’tselem, an Israeli center for human rights in the occupied territories, only selecting excerpts featuring Israeli men, no doubt to avoid speaking for or against the Other.
Zaides pauses the video, espouses the position of one of its protagonists, spins it 180 degrees, mirrors it, flips it by 90 degrees, leaning against the floor to give us the view of the top of his head, like the one the camera gives us by hovering above the protagonist. Archive is challenging because of its subject matter and its clinical approach, the live dance performance being overshadowed by the video images. When it does work, it’s because of the confrontational attitude that necessarily emerges given the source material, as Zaides walks towards us with aggression in his eyes (the audience is visible throughout the show as the house lights, though dim, remain on) before switching to the movement of a man waving his arms around to try to scare sheep away. Before us, humans become animals that need to be displaced. Zaides often returns to this movement. Archive is at its most powerful near the end, when Zaides replicates the vocalizations of the men in the videos into a microphone, looping them, building a soundtrack that is increasingly oppressive and violent. It’s hard to bear even for a few minutes. Imagine for hours, for weeks, for years… May 24-26 at 7pm Place des Arts – Cinquième Salle www.fta.qc.ca 514.844.3822 Tickets: 39$ / 30 years old and under: 33$
Things could have gone down a more simplistic road as, at first, Gutierrez and his partner Mickey Mahar (a sprite-like cross between Sufjan Stevens and Pee-wee Herman) dance synchronously non-stop as percussive music is blasting over the speakers, barely taking a break as Mahar slips a “2, 3, 4” in before launching into yet another dance sequence. However, it’s when they finally stop that the show ironically progresses. The music keeps going, just as loud, but they stand still – much needed rest – holding hands.
When I was young, I used to believe that two people of the same sex holding hands was a political gesture. Then, when I had my first boyfriend, I realized that it wasn’t political but merely natural, that it happens without thinking or even realizing you’re doing it, that your hand searches for the one you love. What I’m saying is, people holding hands are fucking beautiful and Guttierez and Mahar are fucking beautiful. Slowly, their heads turn towards each other and they kiss. So we guess, anyway, since one of them has his back to us, so that they could be pulling a Will Smith in Six Degrees of Separation (but we can safely assume they’re not). And the dance starts up again, in a way that could remind one of the choreography for countless female pop singers. The movements are not difficult to execute, but they become more impressive as they accumulate, playing like a physical version of a memory game. The clarity of and work behind the movement is retroactively highlighted as the dancers switch to a different mode of performance, one that reeks of drunk clumsiness. They display the kind of behaviour where, in the moment, one might be blissfully unaware (humping a speaker, for example); it’s only once you sober up that it’s going to be embarrassing. They also fight in a way that’s more meant to annoy the other person than actually hurt them. In the spoken section, they impressively maintain their synchronicity even as they vary their speech in most comical ways. Particularly delightful is when they say, “We are the faceless, voiceless dancers. Do you want to fuck us?” Unfortunately, Age & Beauty Part 1 ends with its weakest section. Though it decidedly brings us in a different direction, Guttierez’s breaking into song doesn’t fit with the rest of the work. Instead, it feels like a performer’s fantasy, one that has the added drawback of putting Mahar in the background, where he doesn’t belong. Still, Guttierez remains a refreshing voice in queer performance and dance at large. May 23-25 Théâtre Prospero www.fta.qc.ca 514.844.3822 Tickets: 34$ / 30 years old and under: 28$
Audience members gradually regain their seats. Those who remain onstage break up the blankness of the theatre cube, like plants scattered across the space. At the back of the room, video is sporadically projected on a wall made of plywood that’s been painted grey, giving the images an enticing texture.
The dancers’ eyes are often covered, blindness further conveying their isolation. It is more compelling to watch them blindly looking for one another than to watch them execute choreography. With the idleness of confinement also comes play. Performers stand at the back wall before moving through the space to the sound of one of theirs counting. A man attempts to solve a Rubik’s Cube. They run after one another like children in what must feel, if only for a fleeting moment, like freedom. Much like prison, the experience seems more intense for those on the inside than for those of us on the outside. The only moment – too short – that builds up to any kind of intensity as an audience member is when Eduardo Rocha caresses Cristóbal Barreto Heredia’s body while repeatedly asking “T’aimes jouer?” Many of the actions described here can also be seen on the video, which jumps through time and space, like a memory or a dream. The digital duplication makes it seem as though the artists didn’t trust the power of the live performance. As if to confirm this, the show ends with the video rather than with our prisoners. April 8-11 Théâtre Espace Go www.danse-cite.org 514.845.4890 Tickets: 35$ / Students or 30 years old and less: 27$
Ultimately though, the strengths are the same as in dance. For example, there is the beauty of the collective endeavour in a world that is increasingly individualistic and the crucial role that the lighting design by Lucy Carter plays in hiding and revealing bodies. Other similarities with dance abound… Those familiar with choreographer Jean-Pierre Perreault’s work might notice thematic kinship in the tension between the group and the individual who sometimes breaks away, but inevitably gets swallowed back into their midst. Jig and body percussion also make appearances.
With dance it also shares its weaknesses, like when it focuses on physical feats, which in this case are jumps, of course. These inevitably come across as tricks ripe for applause, which they inevitably get, a force of habit that we have figure skating to thank for. As such, the jumps break the flow of the show, momentarily shining a metaphorical spotlight on the one or two skaters involved in the action. It is a fine line between “look at this” and “look at me!” Unlike the rest of the show, these moments leave us with a feeling (which is obviously more than just a feeling) of déjà-vu. Yet it is foreseeable that jumps could be salvaged by getting rid of this metaphorical spotlight, if they were used for their aesthetic qualities rather than as a display for their athletic ones; if they were truly incorporated into the whole as movement through space and layering devices, for their a/synchronism and musicality. Of course, our deepest attraction to Vertical Influences comes courtesy of that which dance cannot offer, that which only skating can give us: in the exhilaration felt when danger is heightened as skaters’ speed and proximity increase; when the music subsides and the blades take over the sound work, most beautifully exemplified by Samory Ba’s solo; in the pristine ice, the entirety of which becomes covered in shreds as the five skaters use it for all it’s worth. Vertical Influences is a sure crowd-pleaser, a sign of the heights to which Le Patin Libre might bring skating if they keep pushing the envelope. March 28-30 Aréna Saint-Louis www.lepatinlibre.com Tickets: 20$ À l’instar de la première édition du Cabaret Gravel, la nouvelle mouture comprend une douzaine de numéros de danse, musique et théâtre par tout autant d’artistes. Le maître de cérémonie Frédérick Gravel a un don certain pour désacraliser l’espace, pour le rendre convivial; la grande scène de l’Usine C a été quelque peu rétrécie pour permettre à bon nombre de spectateurs de s’asseoir à des tables sur trois côtés de la scène et un bar a été aménagé à même la salle. Malgré tout, soir de première, l’énergie n’était jamais tout à fait la même qu’elle était au Lion d’Or lors de l’édition de 2012. Peut-être est-ce en partie pourquoi les numéros ne volent en général pas aussi haut que ceux de l’édition précédente, mais notons tout de même quelques bons coups…
Le MC lui-même ravive l’intérêt pour sa création chorégraphique en dansant un duo inspiré de L’Après-midi d’un faune de Vaslav Nijinsky avec Clara Furey. Gravel conserve la bi-dimensionnalité de l’original, mais a rendu celui-ci plus queer (selon ses propres dires) en voulant rétablir une certaine balance entre la nymphe et le faune. Ce qu’on remarque surtout, c’est que les corps se font plus élancés qu’ils ne le sont habituellement dans la danse de Gravel, une qualité qui laisse entrevoir une nouvelle direction dans son travail. Furey elle-même y va d’une pièce somme toute convenue, mais qui finit tout de même par se démarquer du lot. La danseuse apparaît vêtue d’un chandail et de sous-vêtements noirs et chaussée de souliers à talons hauts scintillants. Elle accumule les gestes aguichants, écarte les jambes et tire sur ses longs cheveux noirs, mais l’effet désiré n’y est pas puisque le mouvement est saccadé, comme si elle n’était pas tout à fait en contrôle de son corps et peut-être encore moins de son esprit. Sa danse dérange plus qu’elle n’émoustille et lorsque Furey bascule dans le numéro qui suit le sien à coups de bribes de chanson pop, elle provoque un rire délicieusement inattendu. De son côté, l’auteur Étienne Lepage signe la pièce qui a la plus grande force de frappe. Trois acteurs émettent des énoncés de bullshit conventionnelle dont on s’attend de nous au « si » avant de prescrire « sauve-toi en courant. » Particulièrement savoureuses sont les répliques réservées à l’actrice (Marilyn Castonguay? Brigitte Poupart?), qui flirtent avec le féminisme. Avant de s’attaquer aux hommes qui urgent les femmes de sourire, elle recommande, « Si quelqu’un te dit que tu n’es pas dans la bonne toilette, dis-lui qu’il n’est pas dans le bon corps. » On se doute aussi que le Darth Vader sacrant de Lepage atteindra sûrement sa cible lorsque l’acteur Philippe Boutin aura bien mémorisé le texte. Selon le programme du spectacle, la durée de la soirée devrait être deux heures avec entracte. Soir de première, nous étions beaucoup plus près du trois heures. Osons espérer que le tir sera ajusté lors des représentations à venir. 4-7 mars à 20h Usine C www.usine-c.com 514.521.4493 Billets : 32$ / Étudiants ou 30 ans et moins : 24$
Avec ses images de meute de loups, la pièce n’est pas sans rappeler Clap for the Wolfman de la New-Yorkaise Shannon Gillen. Toutefois, Demers se fait plus subtile. Nulle trace de violence explicite. Si division il y a, elle ne se trouve pas au sein des interprètes, mais plutôt entre eux et nous, le public. Tous habillés de la même façon (camisoles blanches, pantalons foncés et chaussures à talons hauts), ils demeurent presqu’exclusivement dans une position frontale. Il y a eux et il y a nous.
Ils ne semblent par contre pas autant vouloir nous attaquer que de se protéger. La dualité se déploie entre autres dans le mouvement et l’immobilité. La danse apparaît surtout comme l’écroulement de l’individu au sein du groupe plutôt qu’une prise de contrôle. Les talons glissent contre le sol, les mouvements sont conséquemment maladroits et les chutes suivent, révélant la précarité et la vulnérabilité de l’individu. Pendant ce temps, les autres veillent à leur tâche. Ils maintiennent les apparences en demeurant immobiles tout en soutenant notre regard, faignant que tout va bien dans le meilleur des mondes. Leur force réside dans le groupe et ils le savent. Maintes fois, ils nous montrent les paumes de leurs mains, comme pour nous prouver leur caractère inoffensif. « Qui? Moi? » semblent-ils dire. On ferait mieux de se fier à la saleté qui recouvre leurs avant-bras. En dernière partie, nous avons droit à une belle surprise avec Avant les gens mouraient d’Arthur Harel et du collectif français (LA)HORDE (Marine Brutti, Jonathan Debrouwer, Céline Signoret). Avec quinze danseurs sous la main, le dynamisme est inévitablement au rendez-vous et les chorégraphes poussent les choses encore plus loin. Ils explorent le Mainstream Hardcore en réinterprétant les mouvements du Jumpstyle, du Hardjump et du Gabber. On parle d’un bpm entre 150 et 180. Imaginez. C’est donc d’un « 5, 6, 7, 8 » que la danse explose, lui donnant des airs de power cardio. Les brassières de sport et les espadrilles sont de mise. Heureusement, les reprises et remix douteux de chansons pop sont remplacés par les beats incessants de Guillaume Rémus. La chorégraphie suit. On pourrait ici penser à Bertolina de Sharon Eyal. Le mouvement est tout autre, par contre : petits sauts, quarts de tour, un coup de pied ici et là, on crée une boucle et on répète le tout. Les interprètes trouvent quelques moments de répit sur les clôtures de fer en arrière-scène. De là, ils observent la danse en conservant le look le plus butch possible, ayant l’air aussi hard que les acteurs dans Beat Street. Ils assènent l’air de coups de poing avant de se joindre de plus belle à l’action. Cette énergie est maintenue presque jusqu’à la toute fin du spectacle. (LA)HORDE offre ici la transposition sur scène d’une danse communautaire la plus réussie que j’ai eu la chance de voir. 17-20 décembre à 19h30 Théâtre Rouge du Conservatoire www.admission.com 514.873.4031 poste 313 Billets : 18$ / Étudiants : 12$
C’est un jeu d’ombres qui entame F O L D S. La silhouette d’une immense tête se dessine doucement devant nous, d’abord à peine perceptible dans la noirceur d’où elle émerge. Alors que la lumière en arrière-scène se fait un peu plus insistante, clarifiant les contours, on remarque que les têtes se multiplient, allant grandissant alors qu’elles se rapprochent de nous. Au milieu de cette multiplication, on entrevoit la tête originelle, celle de Germain. Comme dans ses œuvres précédentes, la chorégraphie est lente, douce, méditative. En deuxième partie, le théâtre d’ombres est abandonné en faveur d’un dispositif vidéographique qui une fois de plus multiplie l’image de Germain et de sa partenaire Hélène Messier. Ces apparitions digitales disparaissent en fumée, nous submergeant dans un monde fantomatique. Le dispositif crée aussi un effet miroir qui souligne l’interaction entre le réel et le virtuel. Le corps apparaît comme un contrôleur de jeu vidéo parfaitement calqué sur celui-ci. On voit dans F O L D S les films du célèbre cinéaste d’animation canadien Norman McLaren, dont son classique Pas de deux. L’installation de l’artiste visuelle Lenka Novakova fait aussi penser au travail de Lemieux-Pilon (4d art), eux qui ont d’ailleurs fait un spectacle de danse sur McLaren. Impossible d’accuser Germain de se cacher derrière la technologie. On ne perçoit aucune hiérarchie entre la chorégraphie et la projection vidéo. C’est plutôt la symbiose qui transparaît et on soupçonne que la danse tiendrait la route sans le dispositif vidéographique, comme Germain nous l’a déjà prouvé auparavant avec Aube et Y demeurer. La vidéo ne fait qu’enrichir sa proposition, qui s’avère être d’une grande beauté et poésie. Dès le retour de l’entracte, on se retrouve indéniablement dans un autre univers. Finie la pénombre. Toute la salle est éclairée et les rideaux ont été écartés. Rien n’est caché. Noeser et sa complice Karina Iraola entre en scène de façon décontractée. Soudainement, du flamenco éclate sur les haut-parleurs et les danseurs se laissent envouter par une danse qui n’a rien à voir avec l’Espagne. Le mouvement de tous les deux est plutôt fragmenté par des secousses, tel un disque qui saute. La pièce enfile ces juxtapositions inattendues qui font de RUMINANT RUMINANT la plus drôle des créations de Noeser à ce jour. Comme dans les pièces de la chorégraphe Mélanie Demers, les transitions entre les sections se font sous nos yeux et font partie intégrante du spectacle. Noeser change donc de chandail de façon totalement gratuite et s’assoit sur scène avec une tasse d’eau en attendant que sa partenaire mette la scène pour le prochain tableau, son travail s’étirant (elle quitte même la salle!) alors que Noeser ne fait rien. Autre forme de décalage. Sur son baladeur, il fait jouer une chanson pop (« Ouragan » de Stéphanie de Monaco) et affixe ses écouteurs à ses oreilles à coups de ruban adhésif. Alors qu’il danse de façon excessivement athlétique, c’est plutôt de la musique classique que nous entendons, créant une fois de plus une délicieuse disjonction. Chaque fois que la danse apparaît, c’est avec surprise. Pourtant, nous assistons à un spectacle de danse! se rappelle-t-on. C’est là la force de Noeser, un chorégraphe qui défie nos attentes à tout moment dans une pièce où l’on ressent une grande liberté.
Yellow Towel is messy, and not only in the literal sense that the initially immaculate off-white stage becomes cluttered with props throughout the performance. It is hard to know by which end to pick it up because the edges are all blurred, like they’ve been rubbed off against one another until we are no longer sure what we are looking at exactly. Michel has constructed a show from deconstruction, like all the elements have been passed through a blender, so that it is hard to discuss any single aspect because none of them exist as such. So as I attempt to write about Yellow Towel, I feel it’s important to note that what I am talking about doesn’t even exist, that I am taking a fragment and dusting it off in order to better be able to describe it. However, that description is a lie because the dust is just as important as the fragment.
For these reasons, there is something of an exorcism to Michell’s performance, an unfiltered quality. Words and movements pour out of the body in a seemingly uncontrolled fashion, creating odd and often humorous juxtapositions. “In the beginning,” she might blurt out, but she’s not talking about the Word, though who knows… Her speech runs like an internal monologue, mostly incomprehensible to anyone who is not her, who does not know what fills the gaps. Her body appears to be as uncontrollable as her train of thought. She is hunched over, constantly shaking. When she removes her black hoodie, Q-tips are stuck in her hair. She takes one of them to clean out her ear while blowing in a trumpet. She uses a tiny white blow-up pool as a couch, which molds her body into awkward positions as she clumsily attempts to drink milk, more running down her face than her throat. The character she creates is also elusive. When she puts on a baseball cap, it maintains her hair over her face, rendering her anonymous. Never does she look at the audience, maintaining this internal world that we only get to peek at in the moments that strike us as potentially familiar. It is easy to understand why the prestigious ImPulsTanz Festival created an award especially for Michel. Her performance is one of the most compelling we have had the chance to see in recent years. She fully commits to it, appearing like a medium whose body has been taken over by this strange creature. So, when she spends a few minutes slowly drinking from a bowl of water, we are there with her with the same intensity we would be were she actually possessed. The experience is as fascinating as it is hilarious. December 4-6 at 8pm Montréal, arts interculturels www.m-a-i.qc.ca 514.982.3386 Tickets: 25$ / Students: 20$ |
Sylvain Verstricht
has an MA in Film Studies and works in contemporary dance. His fiction has appeared in Headlight Anthology, Cactus Heart, and Birkensnake. s.verstricht [at] gmail [dot] com Categories
All
|